| Kill
Bill: Vol. 2
By
Peter Tonguette
Peter
Tonguette is a staff writer for The Film Journal. His writing
has also appeared in Senses of Cinema and Bright Lights
Film Journal. You
can visit Peter Tonguette's personal review site here.
|
|
In both Jackie
Brown and Kill Bill: Vol. 2, Quentin Tarantino's camera cranes
up away from key scenes depicting violence. In Jackie Brown, such
a shot occurs when Ordell Robie (Samuel L. Jackson) drives away in his
car to a deserted lot and murders Beaumont Livingston (Chris Tucker.)
In Kill Bill: Vol. 2, a similar shot occurs in flashback, as the
Deadly Viper Assassination Squad enters The Bride's (Uma Thurman) wedding
chapel with the intention of murdering her.
I don't think it's a coincidence that this camera move--which has the
effect of placing the audience at a remove from the action and deglamorizing
it in the process--happens in these two specific Tarantino films, as they
are, perhaps, the two films in his body of work to date with the most
in common with each other. This comes initially as something of a shock
for those who come to Vol. 2 on the heels of Kill Bill: Vol.
1, with its kinetic, astonishingly choreographed fights and visceral
action violence. Vol. 2, while hardly short on flashy moves or
Tarantinoesque excess, is altogether more contemplative from the get go
and its final half hour depicts essentially the same vision as the last
sequences in Jackie Brown do: each film gives us portraits of women
who have been through it all, seemingly, yet who remain as resilient and
strong as ever. Tarantino speaks again and again in interviews of how
much he loves The Bride (whose real name is revealed here, in another
gesture towards her humanization in this picture), as though she was more
than a character to him but a real person. I believe his sincerity. Both
Jackie and Vol. 2 end with virtually the same image: the
film's heroine at the wheel of a car, driving off to a new chapter of
her life.
The promised killing of Bill occurs in this film, but Tarantino has softened
his vision since the last film, locating The Bride's act less in unmitigated
revenge than in a desire to cleanse herself of her past and begin anew-especially
after she learns that her daughter has survived. The emotional power of
this ending makes one regret, indeed, that Tarantino hadn't released both
films as one, as he reportedly originally intended. Vol. 1, being
all setup and anticipation (complete with a genuine cliffhanger of a final
line), didn't suffer as greatly from the split; but because Vol. 2
is constantly playing against and off of the emotions established in Vol.
1, it is left somewhat out in the cold. Tarantino's great wager of
turning a rather chilly revenge picture into essentially a heartfelt story
of a woman and her daughter is to be applauded, but it would have had
even more resonance if we could appreciate that astonishing transition
in tones in one sitting. The good news is that this past May at Cannes,
Tarantino premiered a version of Kill Bill which, it seems, fulfills
his original plan: one long film with intermission.
That film may very well be Tarantino's masterpiece.
|