|
|
||||||
I remember seeing the original Coffee and Cigarettes short film during a rerun of Saturday Night Live quite a few years ago, back when the only thing Roberto Benigni was in that might have made a blip on mainstream America's radar was the ill-conceived Son of the Pink Panther. At this point, I hadnt even seen Benigni's two brilliant turns in Jim Jarmusch's excellent films Down by Law and Night on Earth. The original short film, directed by Jarmusch and featuring Benigni and Steven Wright, had a funky, pointless vibe that I immediately hooked into. It was funny because of its absurdist, random nature, and the magnetic pairing of two polar-opposite personalities in a situation where their only goal seems to be sitting at a table, taking in the title consumables, and talking. When I learned that Jarmusch had made follow-up shorts, and in fact, planned to make an anthology film that would bring those older films together with new material, I was extremely excited. While many other critics seem to consider Coffee and Cigarettes a kind of 11-track film-album novelty, Jarmusch has already displayed his adept ability to work up full-length films from short-film components, in the excellent and underseen works Mystery Train and Night on Earth. Admittedly,
Coffee and Cigarettes is an entirely different animal than either
of those two films. Night on Earth is a much more episodic and less interconnected work, which makes it closer in concept to Coffee and Cigarettes. As the title reveals, the setting of this film is one night, as experienced in taxis in five cities around the world. What distinguishes these vignettes is that Jarmusch seems to adopt the sensibility of each new setting, so that the Helsinki segment has a Scandanavian ambience of deadpan tragicomedy, while the Rome segment (featuring Benigni) is exuberant and almost ludicrous, while the New York segment reflects the funkiness of downtown Manhattan, and so on. At a hair over two hours in length, the film is not just an exercise in style and form, but a revealing and entertaining collection of character studies. The feature-length Coffee and Cigarettes, because of the compressed time of its vignettes, is never really able to achieve the depth of Night on Earth, but that does not make it any less revealing or entertaining. The segment that has gotten the most notice from critics -- the meeting between Alfred Molina and Steve Coogan in what appears to be a warehouse café -- probably is the best component of the film, because in addition to being the most dramatic and perfectly acted of the segments, it also achieves the fullness of the Night on Earth segments in a compacted timeframe. As for the other segments, it will be a matter of each viewer's taste -- as it was with Akira Kurosawa's Dreams, remember? -- which ones seem worthwhile and which ones should have been left to short-film obscurity. For instance,
while many have raved about the sequence in which Cate Blachett plays
a dual role as herself and her less manicured cousin, I personally found
the vignette had nothing to say about the perils of fame that has not
already been covered in thousands of showbiz stories already, and it just
sort of meandered without ever provoking an epiphany or a chuckle. Other personal
highlights include the closing segment featuring Bill Rice and Taylor
Mead as two old-timers on a coffee break, for its quiet elegance and economical
eloquence, and the episode featuring The White Stripes pondering a Tesla
coil, which is the new scene that most closely captured that original
random absurdity of the first short (even though the scene with the RZA,
GZA, and Bill Murray has the best new odd-couple
er, odd-trio casting). Not as well as it could. By itself, it was an interesting diversion, of a much more quirky comic sensibility than one normally finds on SNL. As an opener to a feature film, the acting seems too unfocused and the directing too formally restricted ( cut to 2-shot, cut to overhead shot of coffee cups, cut to 2-shot ) to make viewers feel like they are watching something more substantial than an exercise. Gradually, as more sequences unspool, this feeling fades, and the film overall can be considered a success. After all,
a Jim Jarmusch film is like a John Cassavetes film -- it is a known quantity.
These directors have made films again and again in the manner that they
prefer, and audiences are always split between the fervent followers and
the repulsed disbelievers. If you like Jarmusch, you'll like Coffee
and Cigarettes, and if you don't, I doubt the film's smattering of
famous faces will get you to change your mind.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||